In Australia, a court has allowed a curator to hold an art exhibition exclusively for women. The rationale? “A group discriminated against by men (in this case, women) cannot discriminate against another group (in this case, men).”

This is a fascinating, new, and potentially dangerous experiment in the art world, where you could be denied entry to an exhibition if you’re not a woman, not Black, not Asian, not Muslim, and so on.

Is this good or bad?
It’s both intriguing and insane. After all, the art world has always been about pushing boundaries, shocking people, and provoking controversy.

But there’s a problem…

Art could become even more "closed off." Is this really the time to be experimenting with these ideas, especially when the art world is already struggling with declining interest, both financially (Sotheby’s is suffering) and creatively (AI is challenging the traditional model)?

Sotheby’s Struggles Amid Art Market Decline

Sotheby’s has reported an 88% plunge in its core earnings and a 25% decline in auction sales, signaling a chill in the art market that is hitting one of the industry’s most famous brokers hard.

Weaker luxury spending in China is contributing to the drop in demand for fine art, impacting both Sotheby’s and its historic rival, Christie’s.

One of Sotheby’s marquee auctions fell short of expectations in May when the winning bid for a Francis Bacon portrait of his lover, George Dyer, missed the low end of its $30M-$50M estimate.